On the always worth thinking about Vancouver theatre blog The Next Stage there has been a discussion of the need for better marketing and articulation in contemporary/indie theatre. Most recently in a link to another blog on artists unwilling to be involved in the "muck" of marketing / networking - getting out the vote as it were.
And maybe a day of talking and thinking about my Animateur work, but I rambled in response and thought I should cross post.
For me the "muck" is the struggle to articulate and make clear what we do and why we do it - how to connect that with all the publics that it might connect with.
It's not about making/showing work you don't like (since then you are lying when you say "come see the show, it's great" and nobody likes a liar.)
but about working hard on finding ways to share why you like the work and therefore what other people might like about it.
If I want people to understand why the art is important, Step One will always be: make sure the art is important.
Step Two and forward is the other muck (there is also muck in making important work) – trying to let people know about it. Trying to excite people to come despite all the other things to do, despite all the bad and unimportant art they've seen, despite the cost of ticket, despite all the difficulty and disappointment is hard. It's impossible if I don't believe what I'm saying.
We are not that special or select, what excites us, will excite others.
And maybe not the same others that have bought season tickets at the road house regional for the past 50 years.
So that is the work behind the rhetoric of new audiences.
The work behind being passionate about why something matters (always making sure it does matter.)
And yes, there is something off with the balance when we work very hard to make something that matters and don't have the time / energy / tactics to articulate what matters about it.
Just as there is something deeply out of balance when there is much work and much money put into to convincing people that something matters, when, actually, it doesn't. This is too common, and makes it harder to do the first thing, since all the language has been co-opted.
So yes, how do we find the language for the audiences for our work? I've been trying to start with talking about what is exciting to me, since excitement is contagious.
Thursday, November 6, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Well articulated.
I'm a theatre publicist, and the first question I ask anyone before I will even consider working with them is, "why should people pay money to come see your show? What makes it unique?" If they can't answer that immediately, it's a red flag for me.
Bex,
It's true - though I prefer to frame it around time rather than money. So, what am I doing that is worth an hour and half of someones attention. Plus travel and line up. People (very much including myself) pay money for lots of things of various quality. If the experience is worth it and I've done the work of articulating that to the right people, I think there are people who will show up (and paying as they do so.)
Post a Comment